Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Mid Night Hot Without Cloth

What I wanted to write me! Let us assume

Letter to Radio Maria on May 16, 2009:
"Dear Priest, I am writing to thank you for your educational work on the Law of the Lord.
I learned a lot from your program, and I tried to share that knowledge with as many people as possible
. Now when someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, I simply remind him
that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it is an abomination.
End of discussion.
But I need your advice about some other specific laws and how to apply.
- I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as provided for in Exodus 21:7. What do you think could be
a fair sales price?
- When I give focus to a bull on the altar of sacrifice, I know from the Scriptures that this produces a pleasant aroma
the nostrils of the Lord (Leviticus 1.9). The problem is with my neighbors.
Those blasphemous claim that the odor is not pleasing to them. I have to strike him then?
- I know I can have sex with a woman when she is menstruating (Leviticus 15:19-24).
the problem is: how do you ask them if the have or not? Many women are capable of
offense.
- Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female as long as
are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend says that it is lawful to Mexicans, but not
with the French. Is it true? And if so, why can not I own Canadians?
- I have a neighbor who insists on working on Saturdays. Exodus 35:2 clearly says that
should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him?
- A friend of mine is convinced that though eating shellfish is an abomination (Leviticus 11:10), it is less
homosexuality. I disagree. Can you settle this?
- Leviticus 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have defective eyesight. I must confess that
use reading glasses. Does my vision have to be a 10 / 10
or is there some wiggle room here?
- Many of my male friends shave their hair, including those close to temples, even though
this is expressly forbidden by the Bible (Leviticus 19:27). In what way should be
put to death?
- In Leviticus 11:6-8 is that touching the skin of dead pig makes me unclean. 'S why
that football goalies use gloves?
- My uncle has a farm, went against because Leviticus 19:19 by planting two different types
crops in the same area, even his wife has failed because it uses the same pitch
wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton / polyester blend).
- In addition to his uncle swears it all go. It 'absolutely necessary that all gatherings
men of the city to stone him as prescribed by the scriptures? I could not simply
him on fire while sleeping nicely as Leviticus 20:14 suggest for people who
lie with relatives?
I know that you certainly understand this question, so you will not be hard to help me in
these questions that I posed.
I take this opportunity to say hello cordially in the certainty of the immutability of Scripture.
Devoutly His.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Pakistani Walima Dress For Men

(Piero Calamandrei 1950 Congress in defense of the National School)

"Let's say, so theoretically, there is a ruling party, a ruling party, which, however, formally wants to respect the constitution, not want to violate the substance. Do not want to march on Rome and transform the classroom space for the paddles, but wants to establish, without opinion, a disguised dictatorship.

So, what to do to gain control of the schools and to transform the State schools into Party schools? He notices that the State schools are failing to be impartial. There is some resistance, in those schools there is always, even under fascism has been there. Then the dominant party follows another path (it's all a theoretical hypothesis, mind you). He begins to neglect the public schools, to discredit, to impoverish. Let it anemizzino and begins to favor private schools. Not all private schools. The schools of his party, that party. And then all these treatments are beginning to go to private schools. Cure of money and privilege. He even begins to advise the boys to go to these schools, because basically it says are better than those of the state. And maybe give themselves awards, as now I will tell you, or proposes to give awards to citizens who are willing to send their instead of children to public schools to private schools. A "those" private schools. The exams are easier, unless you study and you do best. So the private school becomes a privileged school.

The ruling party, could not transform the State schools openly in schools of the party, sent to hell for the State schools give preference to private schools. Beware, my friends, this conference this is the point that we must discuss. Warning, this is the recipe. We must keep an eye on the cooks of this low kitchen. The operation is done in three ways: I have already said, ruin the State schools. Let go to hell. Depleting their budgets. Ignore their needs. Mitigate the supervision and control over private schools. Do not check its reliability. Let the teachers teach you that do not have the minimum qualifications to teach. Let the examinations are jokes. Giving public money to private schools. This is the point. Giving public money to private schools. "

Piero Calamandrei

(Speech delivered by Piero Calamandrei the third congress of the Association in Defence of the National School in Rome on 11 February 1950)